Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
"History does not repeat itself. The historians repeat one another." Max Beerbohm
About Me
Labels
- Arts and Entertainment (25)
- Books and Film (37)
- Chicago (9)
- Economy and Consuming (16)
- Education and Academics (25)
- Foreign Affairs (8)
- Guest Writer (1)
- History (17)
- Humor (33)
- Language (3)
- Media (23)
- Meta (26)
- Music (3)
- Politics and Policy (86)
- Popular Culture (6)
- Society and Technology (28)
- Travel (2)
- Urban and Regional Issues (20)
- Washington D.C. (38)
For the Locals
Friends' Blogs
Social Networking
Media
Political Blogs
- American Street
- Arch Pundit
- Crooks and Liars
- Daily Kos
- Eschaton
- Ezra Klein
- Huffington Post Blog
- Inside the USA
- James Wolcott
- Jesus' General
- Joe Trippi.com
- Left in the West
- Lefty Blogs
- Liberal Oasis
- My DD
- SCOTUS Blog
- Sirotablog
- Talk Left
- Talking Points Memo
- Tapped
- Washington Monthly
- Washington Note
- Wonkette
Etc.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(375)
-
▼
June
(57)
- Julius Meinl in Chicago
- The Blame Michael Jackson Syndrome
- "You know of all of the military victories bush cl...
- Adsense
- ...Just don't bring it to the workplace
- Robert Bork is an Idiot
- Why the New York Times is just as bad as the other...
- Photographs like this (NY Times) are a good remind...
- Blogger Awards
- Woah, I just read my last few posts and realize I ...
- Whirlwind Weekend
- Facebook Club of the Week
- Save Me from My Naivite
- Iraq Needs College Republicans
- Krazy Karl (Rove)
- Implications of Seizing Homes and What is being fo...
- Kelo, Eminent Domain, and Our Communities
- Day in Chicago, the Patterson Case
- Witchcraft
- Best Film Quotes
- Why Dick, why?
- Little Black Dress
- I was just informed recently of this website calle...
- Weird Introspectivness
- Apartment
- Today on the train I was sitting in front of possi...
- First day "at court"
- Sidebar
- Shootings and Gun Control
- La base �norme de la Tour d'Eiffel. Again, not ta...
- Paris
- In the Voyeurism Category
- "It represents one of the most shameful episodes i...
- Save Big Bird
- Your libraries are safe, for now.WASHINGTON (AP) —...
- Angry Unstable Politician: Tom Delay, NOT Dean
- Avant Garde Scattergories
- Supporting Howard Dean
- Let's make a deal
- One more thing about the Dean comment that the Rep...
- Left-wing blogs get more readers, participation th...
- Ballz to the wallz! I'm linked on technorati.com a...
- Give Dean a Break
- Mark Warner in 2008?
- I'll credit Republicans with one thing...
- Guess who's coming to dinner at the Bush White Hou...
- Terry Schiavo Autopsy
- Why is the New York Times using a Heritage Foundat...
- Africa was important before Brad Pitt, believe it ...
- Lack of Communication in the Age of Communication ...
- Summer goals
- Re: Template Change
- If You Analyze the Katie Holmes/Tom Cruise Allianc...
- There was a driveby shooting in the town that I'm ...
- White Dog
- The True Meaning of "Awesomely Bad"
- Dear everyone who doesn't update their blogs often,
-
▼
June
(57)
Blog Rings
8 comments:
nice new layout and addition of the sidebar. did you add them in by editing the HTML manually or through a template? it's also about time we had some pictures of you on here to increase the stalker resource quotient (SRQ) of your blog. i believe this is the amount of personal information ascertained through your blog divided by the total content. given the difficulty in quantifying this data, the SRQ is inherently imprecise. however, i'd guess your ballpark SRQ is around .30.
E - - Laine,
Geil, dass du Normans Blog eingebunden hast.
Although I usually disagree with you completely, I love your blog...it's addictive.
Chris
Two of my favorite readers! I am so lucky. Thanks for proclaiming your addiction to my blog, Chris! Heh, I figured you might not agree with most of it! Yeah, Norman actually read my blog through my AIM link, nice guy that he is. (If he's reading this, he sees that I am taking about him--Sorry Norman! Don't worry, only good things). You can probably read his blog much more easily than I can, with your German thesis under your belt if IIRC.
Steph, I added the vary sidebar categories in manually. I've tried to play around with template colors but haven't really gotten anywhere. Haha, is .30 SRQ high or low? Is that existing terminology? That is hilarious and very clever if you made that up. What do you think your SRQ is? Lately mine's gone up a bit, but my PCQ (political commentary quotient) has gone through the roof (which can be correlated to my being home last week+having more spare time+reading Joe Trippi's book), so that balances the SRQ out. Oh, to be a blog dork.
P.S. Chris, let me know if you reignite your blog and want me to link to it!
The Stalker Resource Quotient (SRQ) is my own creation. Although it has yet to be psychometrically validated, I suggest we try to spread the word! I think that a value of .30 isn't too high or too low. If you think about it, some people post exclusively about their personal lives. Stay tuned, I just may write my own blog entry about the exact way to measure it! (Can you tell I'm taking a class on Assessment and currently writing a paper about the validation evidence for an instrument?)
I've been thinking about "reignition" after I get settled in my job with the Senate Budget Committee. ...I'll let you know.
Well since you went and mentioned your interesting-sounding job, you must fill me in on it at some point. (I might be coming to DC in late July, so I'll let you know!)
Well if you are busy Steph, at least it sounds like you are getting a lot out of what you are learning. You should become an SRQ specialist. Is writing a blog about SRQ calibrating the SRQ positively or negatively? How meta is that (sorry).
Post a Comment